Is the prediction published before the match?
A pick given after the fact proves nothing. Look for a date and time of publication, and a way to check that the text was not edited afterwards.
Be wary of sites that only show picks that have already won. Anyone can be right when they say it after the final whistle.
Are losing picks shown like the others?
Nobody wins everything. A record that only shows successes is incomplete, and therefore misleading. A serious site shows its misses as visibly as its hits, and says how many picks its record is based on.
Screenshots of winning tickets prove nothing: they are easy to fabricate, and only the ones that came in get shown.
Ask yourself too whether the record covers the whole period, or only the best run.
Does the site promise winnings?
"100% sure", "guaranteed win", "fixed match": run. Nobody can guarantee a football result. A serious site talks about probabilities, not certainties, and states clearly that a 70% chance still loses three times in ten.
The same goes for "foolproof systems" and "secret methods". If they really worked, nobody would sell them to strangers.
Is the method explained, limits included?
You should be able to see where a number comes from: which data, which logic, which limits. A number without an explanation is an opinion.
On IASHARK, the approach is described on the methodology page. Apply the same checklist: judge on the evidence.
What can you check for yourself, in practice?
- Keep a record. Take a dated screenshot of a pick before the match, then compare it with what the site shows afterwards.
- Do not judge on ten picks. Ten predictions prove nothing, for or against. You need hundreds of matches to judge a method.
- Compare with the market. If a site says 90% on a match where the odds point to around 50%, ask yourself why. Our guide to reading odds explains the sum.
Before you pay for a subscription, read the cancellation terms too. A serious site makes them easy to find.
Who is behind the site, and how does it make money?
Look for legal notices, a publisher's name and a contact that answers. The site must be closed to under-18s.
A serious site also says how it makes money: subscriptions, advertising, partnerships. That is not a flaw, it is information. Be wary of a site that lives only on sign-ups with operators: it has every reason to promise you winnings.
It should not push you towards an unlicensed operator either. Only use operators licensed by the regulator of your own country, and check that licence on the regulator's own website.
On the site, find these in a few minutes: the date of a prediction, a losing prediction, and an explanation of the method. If any one of the three is missing, move on.
Frequently asked questions
Do you have to pay to get good predictions?
Price proves nothing either way. Judge the site on its transparency, its method and whether you can try it before paying.
Is a screenshot of a winning ticket proof?
No. It is easy to fabricate, and only the hits are published. You need a complete, dated record.
Should the announced chances always come true?
No. If a site says 70%, it should be wrong about three times in ten. A site that is never wrong is hiding results or lying.
Can a prediction ever be a sure thing?
No. Even an 80% chance loses one time in five. Any site that talks about certainty is lying or mistaken.
See today's free match
Judge on the evidence: every day, IASHARK gives away the analysis of one match, with the calculated chance of each outcome. Create a free account to see it.
See today's free match →